|
Ugly
Politics
Sandra Hartle
11/20/2003
Get
ready people we are in for a treat like
none other ever seen in this
country. This will be a season of
"Ugly
Politics" like you have never
witnessed. The left backed by Hollywood
in some sort of a hate driven fury over
having a Republican President, is
resorting to new levels of degradation.
I guess they were not ready for the
backlash they have created by going down a
well greased slippery slope into
depravity. Ratings are falling
on all the local networks. This
isn't because more people are choosing to
watch the pay stations either, it is a
simple rejection of garbage in our living
rooms.
This
weeks offerings from "Law and
Order" included the main characters
having a battle royal over our current
President and his policies.
Unfortunately, I quit watching Law and
Order years ago out of boredom, so I
didn't actually see the entire show, only
a snippet of it on Brit Hume's Program on
Fox News Yesterday afternoon.
Two of the Characters were going at it
over whether or not President Bush
lied to us to get us into the war on
terrorism, in particular the current
conflict in Iraq. One
Character even implied that he somehow
planned the attacks on the Twin Towers
himself.
Despite
the recent news that indicates that Saddam
and bin Laden have been working together
for more than a decade these accusations
of the "big lie" persist, and
fall off the lips of nearly every Democrat
that gets face time on the television
set. An article written by Oliver
North in today's, Townhall
explains some of the problems we are
looking at for this political
season. Yet, this is just the
tip of a rather large iceberg.
Because
I don't write ordinarily for other
publications I receive tons of emails from
individuals on the writings I post on our
website. Many of these are
from those of the liberal persuasion who
think that I am a complete moron. Of
course they are entitled to think what
they wish. However, based on the
hateful method they use to relay their
messages I suspect they aren't going to
get many converts to their way of
thinking.
It
appears that even though the internet is
swamped with as many liberal websites as
there are conservative sites, that those
of the liberal persuasion don't think the
right has a right to an opinion.
Sadly for them, freedom of speech is not
limited to their opinions.
Now
you would think that after the
"Ire" they created over defaming
the Reagan's
with a proposed mini series that is
intended to slander the last well thought
of Republican President, Ronald Reagan and
his wife and family, they would have seen
the light. But no, Hollywood
apparently needs to be hit over the head
with a sledge
hammer in order to get the
message. So we are about to be
treated to a season of programming that
includes a heavy political message that
Republicans are bad for this
country. This of course will
be the replacement for negative political
advertising that the new laws regarding
"fair play" before an election
prevent. Why spend money
on advertising when you can just
incorporate the message into your regular
programming?
And
they thought ratings were tanking
before?
Personally
I am not satisfied that they moved the
movie the Reagan's to Showtime. Now
on message boards across the country we
are being told that teachers will record
this showing to take to their schools and
make sure that our young people in school
view the movie. Once again
exercising their superiority over the
ignorant parents in this
country. Is this a violation
of copyrights laws? I would provide
a link to one such site, but see no reason
to provide them with advertising from this
site.
So
I wonder who these writers are, and what
their real agenda is? It seems
that some of the folks behind our new
viewing pleasures are quite proud of their
work and have a program running on VH1
called "Totally Gay" that not
only reveals who is behind the new skin
shots we are being treated to, but they
also take bragging rights on the
"inclusion" of everything gay
into every program we are being spoon fed
these days. Bravo is running a
program now that glorifies "gay"
weddings, of course in all the states at
this point in time they cannot obtain a
marriage license but hey, why let little
annoying laws stop you from proceeding
with your agenda? Right?
According
to the most recent Census report there is
about .5% of the nation that claim to be
in long term same sex
partnerships. Now it seems to
me if they want some real support for
their efforts all those living together
under these circumstances would identify
themselves and stand up and be
counted. Yet, they persist in
claiming that up to 10% of our population
is gay stating that they won't identify
themselves due to prejudice. But
wait, a Census does not show who gave the
information to anyone but the government,
and we are not able to review anything
other than their findings. Under
those conditions you would think I would
have a neighbor or two that was gay,
but none are anywhere to be
seen. And despite their plight
or presumed plight, a marriage license is
not needed to invoke legal ability to
leave your inheritance to your partner or
to buy property together, gay or
otherwise. All that is needed
to do such is a will and a partnership
agreement. Of course this
means that the partner is not able to
collect social security paid by the other
partner, but I suspect in most of these
same sex establishments both parties are
gainfully employed.
At
any rate, it appears that the main issue
for this coming election is going to be
designed around whether or not you support
or do not support gay
marriage. Do the Democrats
think that less than 5% of the country who
are eligible to vote, will carry them to
the White House? Recent polls
indicate that 72% of the country are fully
against legalizing 'gay
marriage'. In another poll
taken by Vote.com,
68% out of 606,567 who voted say they are
against "gay marriage" being
legalized in this country.
Yet, the court
in Massachusetts is going to take this
matter out of the voter's hands and go
around the legalities of having the
legislature make new laws by doing it
themselves. This will surely
be a hot issue in the upcoming
election. And no matter how
many times the representatives from GLAD
(check the transcripts for the November
20, 2003 show on Hardball) misrepresent
the will of the people on this issue, it
is using the court to bully others into
doing what they want. But wait
isn't that what they say everyone does to
them?
Personally
I am growing weary of everyone with a
cause taking it to the court to change the
way the majority in this country must
function in order to accommodated their
agenda. Small minorities are
over running our courts
with law suits that end up affecting
the majority when the decision comes down
in their favor. A prime
example is the recent case against the Pledge
of Allegiance for including the words
"under God". One man
took this to court, and though he doesn't
come out with the facts, he is a
representative the American Atheist who
are fully against everything that includes
God in this country, and it is their cause
to have "God" removed from
public view. Of course their ally
the ACLU
is only too willing to attack every state
in order to have their will imposed once
again on the majority, who support the
display of the 10
Commandments, and the words
"Under God" in our
Pledge. One recent court case
even went after a woman who had a sign
in her yard because the housing she
was in was public housing. We are
winning some of these cases, but every win
they attain gives them ammunition
for their next attack.
The most recent one being legalizing gay
marriage.
Sandra Hartle
Email: sandrahartle@juntosociety.com
Sandra
Hartle is a retired Real Estate Agent,
Former Stock Broker, and short term Boeing
Employee. While with the
Boeing Company she received 19 awards for
outstanding performance. One such
award is usually reserved for Engineering
staff only, and a cost savings award that
included a payment of $10,000 the maximum
paid for this type of award. She
achieved her MBA while raising three
children, selling Real Estate for 20
years, and operating a horse
boarding/training facility. She is
the one of the founders and
editor/webmaster of www.juntosociety.com
Post
Comments
|
